Thursday, March 21, 2013

Shiva Trilogy – Decoding the myth of the revenge of a Mahadev


Bending forward Shiva kissed Sati Passionately.
He turned around hearing a sound. “This is an open deck. Can’t you both get a room?” asked Veerabhadra as he entered the deck even as Krittika patted his chest in embarrassment.
A smiling Shiva hit his friend playfully on his shoulder.

This was one of the many reasons that kept me engrossed to the Shiva Trilogy, the thought of the God we fear the most, is depicted as one among us. A chillum smoking barbarian with a haunted past carefully chosen to be a Mahadev, not only of gift, but also of reason. Then why did the trilogy that made us worship Shiva not as a God but as a hero, ended up as just another revenge novel? May be this first time author panicked at the wake of such enormous pressure or he wanted to shock us in the end and make a sensation of it. Well, for what it’s worth, he made us talk about it alright, but not in the right way. The feeling was more of betrayal on the part of the author than of a shock in awe.

The series had all the ingredients of a blockbuster commercial movie. A reluctant hero who takes up his chosen task in the wake of disturbing events, a leading lady put under enormous hardships only to be rescued by the hero, a two faced father of the lady & her weak mother, an angry young man with a heart of gold who is out for answers, a gifted son, an honest lieutenant, a mastermind who stays in the background, friends of the hero ready to die for him, sounds like Bollywood isn’t it?

The series unfolded swiftly with a bit of twist here and there (Sati’s predicament, the identity of the hooded naga, the secret of the nagas being a person & the unveiling of true evil) ready for an enthralling finish only to falter at the final hurdle. But that will not take away the amazing journey that we took along with Shiva along the vast expanses of India, relishing in her rich history and deep philosophy.

Mr. Amish Tripati has treaded a careful path while dealing with four very delicate matters, Religion, History, Philosophy and Politics. We all know the history and been told about the mythological characters right from our childhood. One slip and it would have been a never ending fall. Philosophy had profound meanings and history, although twisted at times (Sangamtamil? Lord Manu a Pandya King? Please!), was still good enough for the plot. But the point where it captures the viewers was the humanization of the gods we revered. To me, Karthik mouthing bad words was like “wow!” rather than “eew!”

Then why this supposedly modern take on the Shivapuranam, end like a B-Centre commercial movie? Having discovered the true identity of evil and set on course to destroy it, why did Shiva, hell bent on revenge, did the unthinkable? His anger, which his uncle had repeatedly asked him to control, took the better of him. When he had to let Parvateshwar go, despite protests from everyone he let him go and said that it’s important to win the battle the right way. If he had that vision, then why did he destroy an entire city because of Sati’s fate? It contradicted with the claims of him being a Mahadev. And the whole villainy was so weak. I expected more from Bhirgu’s character and was so looking forward to his confrontation with Shiva. Puff! So disappointed!

Imagine this! After Sati had met with her fate, it should have come down to the use of Somras to rescue her (Remember, they had healing powers that saved Sati after she was stuck with a fire arrow). Shiva now has to decide whether to use it on his beloved wife or stand by his belief that the Somras is evil and let Sati die. That would have been a grandstand finish. Instead what transcribed is an incompetent climax that left everyone shell shocked, mind you not in the right way. In a brief 10 minute conversation with Amish when I met him at the (belated) book launch in Chennai, I put forward the same scenario. He thought about it for a moment and replied “That would have been difficult to finish!” First time author blues maybe! But he also said that he wanted to align Sati’s fate with that of the puranas in which she dies. And in the climax where Shiva uses the Pasupathiastra, he said he wanted to portray Shiva as a human and also justified it by the fact that Shiva had asked anyone not involved in the manufacture of Somras to leave. Still not convinced I must admit. It may be down to our denial to see our gods anything other than gods, even in a human form. Remember even Ram wanted Sita to testify and Krishna used a number of questionable tactics to get the victory in Kurukshetra. But even otherwise, the climax left a lot to be desired.

On an overall scale, yes it’s been an incredible journey, one that we all made, screaming Har Har Mahadev in our hearts during the first battle (Illayaraja’s Sanskrit song “Har Har Mahadev” that gives me goose bumps every time I hear it, was in my ears at that time & how perfect it was!). We felt sorry for Sati’s fate both when she was a vikarma & in the end, hoping against hope that Daksha would be a stronger person. We got bored of Parvateshwar’s style of life (We are all Chandravanshis aren’t we!). We were first so intrigued on who the hooded naga was, believing him to be the ultimate bad guy only to be shell shocked, this in the right way, with his true identity. We frowned at Karthik’s over confidence but admired when he did the right thing in the end. We loved Bhadra treating Shiva as a friend even if he was a Mahadev. So it had its moments, a lot of it. But ultimately fell through when it mattered most. It was like a world champion racer, leading from the start, only to crash in the final lap of the race. That’s how it felt in the end. But it was a refreshing read, a trend setter. What it did was to bring out the child in us. Reading the book was like listening to our grandma’s stories, full of imagination. And for that, I salute Amish Tripati. Hoping that with his take on the Mahabharatha, (Shiva’s permission or not, he will write on the mother of all storytellers I can guarantee that) he will take the chequered flag.

“Har Har Mahadev”

6 comments:

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

Sure.. i haven't gone through the last part of Mahadev's journey yet.. but i will start it asap.. until then.. i will keep my mind open for the amazing, adventurous and astonishing travel till now and forthcoming...

Sid @ iwrotethose.com said...

Har Har Mahadev indeed! You haven't lost much of your writing flair, my old friend (Great, now I'm talking like one of Amish's characters) - Well written indeed and a good detailed analysis :)

For me, the Shiva trilogy has been a great journey. To come clean, I might even say that, I'm not one of the extreme Shiva bhakts either (Well, I am more closer to it now - but thats more to do with my own research :)). Delving into the realm that is Shiva, I suppose anyone who has encountered the various Shiva story versions out there has always wondered what made this man tick. I mean, what makes him the God of Gods - the Mahadev ! I reckon through this "trilogical" version, Amish has possibly endeavoured to bring out the humanisms in Shiva - instead of preaching and acting on Dharma, the Amish Shiva relates more to the average man - love for his woman, family, true to his friends, instantaneous anger, revenge for the death of his loved ones; I personally reckon this mortal personification of Shiva lends a layer of credibility to the great Lord Neelkanth, and makes him a " Lord of the People" (Yes, I know Ganesh is referred to as such in the book, and elsewhere :))

With ref. to the ending, yes, it was far too "Bollywoodish" for my liking. So in that respect, for me, Amish has amazingly written 2 and three quarters of a Shiva trilogy; One has to wonder if the Bollywood Fraternity's proposition of adapting the first book into a movie, had anything to do with his need to end the trilogy in this fashion. Personally, I may have chosen to end the book with Shiva drawing back his bow;

Heart Break Kid said...

Even when the Pasupathiastra was kept ready for launch, I was still expected Shiva to do what's for the larger good than extract revenge. The felling in the end was that of an overwhelming betrayal. But yet, it did not take away the rest of the book. My admiration for Shiva has only gone up. This book is making me to read even more and understand one of the complex, feared and least understood characters in mythology.

K Ravisankar said...

Great da.

Your writing is getting tuned day by day. This one, where u bring out your emotional opinion on the third trilogy, altho' I dont seem to agree with you to some extent in the content, is drafted in a very good way. You do have a pen with you. Go ahead writing some ventures and we will be here to review you. Happy to be your friend, the friend of a successful future writer.

Shiva of our epics did loose his sati through her father Dhaksha. He was a sample God, a sample Human, a sample Lover, a sample Father and a sample Mahadev in the string of mahadevs. It is true that he loved her to a great extent and every contemporary-body did. It is true that the thripuram was burnt by him through a deivi asthram after due consideration of the elements. Those who support evil are destined to perish with the evil and that is the grammer of our divinity.

When Somras was identified as evil, even tho' the end product had dramatic curing effects, if it was used to wake up sati, it would have resulted as a weak ending and provided a wrong proceedance. Shiva never wanted to be a bad sample.

Again the making of Somras was the evil and not the product or its technology, which was very positively authored. The supporters to evil were not individually identified; but let to nominate themselves; but those who contributed to its protection operationally and technically were duly protected and preserved. Even those who were supporters to the supporters were allowed to make their decision on their destiny Anandhamayi for instance). This is the way of life be it for God or Human in our epics.

I fully agree with wild imaginations of sangam tamil and the southern geographic depictions. Hope little studies were made by the author in this regard. I dont remember Lemuria, now under the sea, had any such History.

Good is always good and bad is always bad. The good has some bad in it and the bad also has some good in it. When the good becomes bad and viceversa is contemporarily circumstantial. May be there are errors but no blunder and things in my opin are well in line with the shiva stories we hear.

Great review and Amish would have felt happy to read it.

If MBAs can become writers, MSes can also be. Why dont you try on a plot?

Ravi

Heart Break Kid said...

Uncle. Thank you for your valuable comments. My imagination at this stage stops in 2 pages so I stick to reviews. Once it expands, so will my writing. But I sincerely believe that I am too lazy to write something big. See, I did not want Shiva to use Somras to rescue his wife. He was able to look at the larger picture before and could have still destroyed the Somras. The place where I diagree is the way he finished. It was way to simple and I thought my scenario would have made Shiva to make a compelling choice between destoying the Somras & saving his wife. Thats would have been a blockbuster finish.